Papers: Dosoo

27th International Congress of Papyrology, Warsaw, 29 July–3 August 2013

MAGICAL DISCOURSES, RITUAL COLLECTIONS: CULTURAL TRENDS AND PRIVATE INTERESTS IN EGYPTIAN HANDBOOKS AND ARCHIVES

While many scholars (e.g. Ritner 1995; Pernigotti 1995) have recognised the important continuities in Egyptian magico-religious practice from the Pharaonic through to the Coptic period, others have noted the equally striking differences in the types of rituals attested by the surviving evidence. Assmann (1994-1995) comments that the Greek and demotic papyri from the Roman period contain a “magical discourse” which is “fundamentally different from that of the tradition- al Egyptian sources”, and similar observations have been made by Borghouts (1974), Brashear (1995), Frankfurter (2000) and Dielemann (2003), among others. These commentators note the more “aggressive” nature of the Roman-period material, consisting largely of love spells, divination procedures and curses in contrast to the generally apotropaic and medical character of Pharaonic rituals, linked perhaps to a shift from the temple to the private sphere. Similarly, a fur- ther change seems to take place within Coptic texts, in which we find less of a focus on divination relative to the Roman-period, and a greater attestation of practices such as exorcism. These generalisations hold true for the largest English language collections from the three periods – Borghouts (1978) for Pharaonic, Betz (1992) for Roman, and Meyer and Smith (1999) for Coptic – but the contents of these three collections are all to some extent affected by the accidents of sur- vival and the selection criteria of their respective editors; in particular, we might note that three quarters of the material in Betz may derive from a single archive. This paper will critically examine the question of changing ritual practice in Egypt by analysing the contents of ritual collections constituted in antiquity – archives and handbooks on papyrus and parchment – in order to understand how far these may reflect the tendencies of their period on the one hand, and the personal interests of their authors and owners on the other.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s